Top Ten Immediate Reactions to Selection Sunday01. In terms of who got in and who got left out, I have no complaints. I was hoping Iona and NC State would get in, because I thought they deserved bids, and they are part of the field. The only potential complaint would be leaving Drexel out and including BYU, but after looking at their resumes, I think we're splitting hairs on that one. By and large, I think the Committee did a solid job selecting the pool of teams to make up the field of 68.
02. Every year, there's one region that seems to stocked full of blue-blood programs, and this year it appears to be the South - Kentucky, Duke, Indiana, and UConn. Speaking of the South, Dick Vitale and Jay Bilas repeated my initial reaction: being the overall #1 seed in the tournament does you no favors at all. We saw it last year with Ohio State, and this year with Kentucky. Strong argument that both were put into the toughest region of the four.
03. I hate when they make two mid-major teams play each other in round 1 (I'm not calling the "First Four" round 1, or the real first round "round 2" sorry). Wichita State takes on VCU. Prior to the brackets, both of those teams were talked about as being capable of winning 2 games in this tournament; now, only one can do so.
04. Vanderbilt takes on Harvard in the Nerd Bowl. Vandy is a 4 or 5 seed every single year ... the last 3 times, of course, they've lost in the first round. If they play like they did today in the SEC championship -- which they won't -- they should be a Sweet 16 team. History demands that you consider taking Harvard here, doesn't it? Vandy
has to do better this time ...
05. If you don't think ratings and story-lines are a big part of the bracketing, you're kidding yourself. Since they revealed their overall seeds (1 through 68) this year, we know that Duke was the #6 team, and they're in UK's bracket, as opposed to the #8 overall team, Missouri. Wonder why that is? Also, Indiana could have been switched with Michigan or Wisconsin, but the thought of a re-match in the Sweet 16 was too sexy to pass up, right? And wouldn't you just know that UConn would be opposite Kentucky, given the fact that their coaches hate each other and it presents a re-match of last year's Final Four? I see what you did there, Selection Committee. Generally, the South is set up for ratings bonanzas (UK-UConn, UK-IU, UK-Duke), but I don't think we get them all. I could see Iowa State taking out UConn, Wichita State taking out IU (sorry, Hoosiers, but losing your only senior contributor, at 11ppg on the eve of the tourney is cause for some concern), and/or Baylor taking out Duke ... with Baylor knocking off Duke as the most likely of the three.
06. Missouri was #8 overall ... everyone (including me) thought they were in the discussion for the last #1 seed. They were closer to being a #3 seed than they were a #1, which seems ridiculous. But they end up out West with a favorable road to the Elite 8. I don't see Florida or Marquette/Murray State giving them much trouble. Speaking of Florida, take them over Virginia, and
bet that line big (currently -3.5).
07. Biggest upset specials? Davidson (over Louisville), Belmont (over Georgetown), Iona (over TBD), and Texas (over Cincy). You'll hear some buzz for 15th-seeded Detroit to knock off Kansas this week, but I don't think it happens.
08. Going to miss having Butler in the tournament this year.
09. I know the Pac-12 was awful this year, but I'm shaking my head at the thought of the regular season champion -- Washington -- not even getting into the tournament. That's some crazy sh*t right there. Team was way too inconsistent and blew it in the Pac-12 tourney (thanks to four missed FT's by Tony Wroten Jr. in the final minute, of course ...).
10. My Final Four = Kentucky v. Missouri, and Ohio State v. North Carolina.